Just Immigration: American Policy in Christian Perspective by Mark R. Amstutz

Just Immigration: American Policy in Christian Perspective by Mark R. Amstutz

Author:Mark R. Amstutz
Language: eng
Format: epub
Publisher: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company


The Bible and Political Advocacy

What role should Scripture play in advancing public policies? Should biblical passages be used to justify and promote policy reform? Some Evangelicals have argued that comprehensive immigration reform is justified biblically. An official of the Evangelical Immigration Table, for example, writes, “Scripture is at the center of why I and so many American Evangelicals have become vocal advocates of immigration reform.”37 Most Evangelicals concerned with immigration reform, however, are far more reluctant to justify policy advocacy using the Bible. Some of the immigration studies by Evangelical groups emphasize that Scripture should not be used to advance policy goals. The National Association of Evangelicals’ “Immigration 2009” resolution declares, for example, that the Bible does not offer “a blueprint for modern legislation.”38 The CRC immigration study similarly emphasizes the limits of Scripture in making public policy. It observes that God’s commands to the ancient Israelites, as recorded in the Old Testament, provide important principles that can help frame contemporary concerns. At the same time, it emphasizes that the church should not “commit the error of adopting God’s theocratic blueprint for Israel as though it represents government structures, laws, and policies that must be incorporated in the United States . . . today.”39 According to Carroll, the Old Testament does not offer “a blueprint for action” on immigration concerns.40 And after examining Jesus’ teachings, he says that “there is no explicit teaching on immigration in the Gospels.”41

Despite the acknowledgment that Scripture should not be used to directly advance specific public policies, most of the Evangelical immigration documents that I examined do just that, implicitly if not explicitly. They do so by using specific biblical texts to emphasize certain themes, such as hospitality and compassion, and by selectively using biblical principles to advance particular policy goals. Indeed, the major shortcoming of Evangelical advocacy is the uneven and unbalanced use of scriptural norms to advance specific public policy goals, such as legalization of unauthorized aliens. But the misuse or selective use of the Bible not only distorts divine revelation but potentially undermines the church’s moral authority. To avoid such distortion, some denominational statements provide a balanced listing of biblical principles but then recommend actions that are consistent with only some of the norms. Another equally serious limitation occurs when the recommended actions are totally divorced from the biblical analysis preceding it. These limitations have been consistently evident in Evangelical declarations that emphasize human dignity, on the one hand, and the rule of law and border security, on the other hand.

The 2011 Southern Baptist Convention resolution on immigration, for example, calls attention to such biblical ideals as human dignity, compassion, and the rule of law, and to governmental norms such as border security and lawful employment practices.42 Finally, it recommends the legalization of unauthorized aliens, and does so independently of the other pronouncements and without acknowledging the inherent tension between the rule of law and the legalization of those who have violated the law. The “2014 Resolution on Immigration” by the Evangelical



Download



Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.